Categories
- A.I. (12)
- Authorised Push Payment fraud (1)
- Blog posts (29)
- Business Email Compromise (18)
- Case Studies (31)
- Crypto in divorce (1)
- Cryptocurrency investigation (51)
- Cyber Investigation Services (103)
- Internet Defamation and Online Libel (29)
- Litigation Support & Electronic Discovery (43)
- Media (11)
- Romance Scams (3)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Wire fraud (3)
[Jan 25, 2015]
•
Rexxfield
Identify Anonymous Twitter User
See Also: “Remove Content from Google Search Results Instructions” We can help you positively identify anonymous Twitter users very quickly, and without a court subpoena, which twitter will insist on should you take the litigation route. Even Law Enforcement uses our proprietary services where time is of the essence. Submit your case summary here and
[Jan 07, 2015]
•
Rexxfield
Email Spoliation of Evidence – Email Records
Email Spoliation of Evidence – Email Records In AJ Holdings,5 after holding a four-day evidentiary hearing, the motion court granted spoliation sanctions. The motion court reviewed each of the three factors set forth in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg,6 which states that the “party seeking an adverse inference instruction … based on the spoliation of evidence
[Jan 07, 2015]
•
Rexxfield
Service of Process by Social Media
Service of Process by Social Media In Noel B, * in a support proceeding, the court authorized substitute service of process by transmitting a digital copy of the summons and petition to the respondent’s Facebook account. They followed this up with a physical mailing to the respondent’s last known address. The court ordered the petitioner
[Nov 15, 2014]
•
Rexxfield
1st Amendment Rights of Anonymous Online Antagonists
Appeals court refuses to adjudicate 1st Amendment rights of anonymous online antagonists. When charged for receiving payments as part of a kickback scheme, Stacey Jackson pleaded guilty. This pleading has effectively ended a dispute over the production of records relating to a pair of online pundits through NOLA.com. The federal appeals court ruled last Monday.
[Jul 04, 2014]
•
Rexxfield
Google EU’s “Right To Be Forgotten” Search Result Removal Request Form
Google EU’s “Right To Be Forgotten” Search Result Removal Request Form European Breakthrough: The EU Court of Justice ruled that EU citizens can ask search engines to remove search results containing their name if the results are “inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive.” European Commission “Right to be Forgotten” ruling(C-131/12) In implementing this decision, Google claims that
[Mar 18, 2014]
•
Rexxfield
Internet Defamation in Australia: Clean Up Your Reputation
Defamed in Australia: A Guide to Cleaning Up Your Reputation Internet defamation is a growing problem all over the world. If you are an Aussie, then Australia does have laws in place that can help clean up one’s reputation online more easily than in the U.S. In this guide, we will look at various methods
[Dec 06, 2013]
•
Rexxfield
How To Subpoena Google
See Also: “Remove Content from Google Search Results Instructions” There is an effective way and a sloppy way to serve a subpoena or court order to Google.com… If you need to subpoena Google for information pertaining to a civil or criminal lawsuit or action, it may not be as easy as you think. Google does
[Nov 05, 2013]
•
Rexxfield
How to Subpoena Bing.com
Give Notice to Microsoft Corporation Bing’s Legal Support to Serve a Civil Subpoena, Court Order or Criminal Warrant NOTE: If you seek originating IP addresses or other identifying evidence from Microsoft’s Bing.com, bear in mind that delays and attorney bills can be dramatically decreased by engaging Rexxfield. CRUCIAL: Before serving court orders on Bing.com, or
[Aug 28, 2013]
•
Rexxfield